canon 16-35 f4 vs 17-40 f4

Canon 16-35 F4 IS Review Overview The Canon 16-35 F4 IS is Canon’s newest Ultra-Wide Angle Zoom with F4, Image Stabilization and like the 17-40, has an all-internal focusing design. The 16-35’s optical design incorporates new optical elements, image

Aperture: Maximum: f/4, Minimum: f/22

18/2/2017 · Canon 17-40 f4 L vs Canon 16-35 f4 L IS Feb 15, 2017 Hi guys! After buying a 5D Mark IV body, I only have enough cash to buy one lens. I shoot mainly landscapes so wide angle is my priority. Ive been looking at both of these lenses and there is quite a price

Canon 16-35 f4L vs Sigma 14-24 f2.8 Art: Canon SLR Lens 13/5/2018
16-35 F2.8 L II vs III vs 16-35 f4L IS and Rokinon 14mm F2 30/4/2018
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS USM vs Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM: Canon SLR Lens T 17/3/2017
Canon 16-35 f4 IS vs 17-40 AGAIN!: Canon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography 11/11/2016

查看其他搜尋結果
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視10:18

24/6/2018 · Canon 16-35 F4 Review Hands-On vs. 17-40 Shootout – Duration: 24:38. Breakthrough Photography 127,512 views 24:38 Sony FE 16-35 2.8 G Master vs Sony 12-24 F4 G Wide Angle Zoom Comparison

作者: Oma Ghomrawi
按一下以在 Bing 上檢視11:40

13/6/2019 · Canon makes two 16-35mm L Series lenses: an f/2.8 and an f/4. They’re both incredible, but there’s a $1000 price difference. Is that difference really worth it, and how much of an impact does

作者: The Enthusiasm Project

Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM vs Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to

我用24-70 f4 及17-40 試過對比,16-35 在24-35段冇24-70 咁靚,叉DD 對焦都慢DD.但在16-24 新鏡,畫質,對焦,快門 靚17-40 一班。$7000左右算ok .另佢canon 的Is 功能強

5/8/2012 · 16-35 is the better lens, but its not double-the-price better. People whine about the 17-40 @ F4 but as you note, who is shooting landscapes @ F4?? At f8ish & up the difference is virtually zero, for some reason the 17-40 is one of those lenses that folks like to go

Canon 17-40L Corners F4 What the 17-40L seems to do is be decent further out towards the corners then just rapidly drop off into mush. But compared to 16-35 it is starting at F4 obviously. It would make sense if the 16-35L behaves similar at F4. I wouldn’t call

Sharpness Shootout Part 1 OVERVIEW • SHOOTOUT 1 • SHOOTOUT 2 • LANDSCAPE • TRAVEL • DESIGN • CONCLUSION • GALLERY In this section I’ll be conducting a series of optical performance testing side-by-sides between Canon 16-35 F4 IS vs. Canon 17-40 F4, with an emphasis on center-to-corner sharpness testing.

Il Canon 17-40 e il Sigma 12-24 si avvicinano notevolmente, e sono molto più economici! Il Canon 16-35 II ha anche il vantaggio della massima qualità costruttiva e un diaframma molto luminoso, ma dovete valutare se questi vantaggi valgono il prezzo, in base al

14/2/2020 · Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM 分類 超廣角變焦鏡頭 對應最大片幅 35mm 全片幅 焦距 17 – 40 mm 光圈 恒定光圈 f/4 Panasonic Lumix S Pro 16-35mm F4 0 用家心得 Tokina atx

7/5/2014 · need that f2.8 that the 16-35 offers then the 17-40 can’t compete with it’s constant f4. What I will say is that on most occasions shooting landscape involved using a tripod so if you were predominantly shooting this way then for me it’s a no brainer, save the huge

29/6/2014 · 16-35 F4L VS 17-40 F4L – 最近Canon 推出了 16-35mm F4L,是否有大大比較過16-35mm F4L和17-40mm F4L的差距呢?兩者差價大約1萬,是否值得上16-35mm f4L?(Canon單眼相機

Sharpness at 16mm

19/2/2020 · Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens review: Popular high-performance option Introduction Introduced in 2003 the EF 17-40 f/4L USM was one of the first of the lightweight pro-level L-series zooms from the firm adopting a constant f4 aperture.

Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM vs Tamron 17-35mm F2.8-4 Di OSD to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to

Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM各焦段示意圖 為了要讓大家更了解 16-35mm 各焦段的實際透視,因此筆者在按照鏡頭上的焦段刻度16,20,24,28,35 分別各拍一張做成 GIF 檔,讓大家了解各焦段的透視和可被拍攝的範圍。 EF 16-35mm F4、EF 35mm F1.4

Click on the following image to open a comparison (in a new window) that will show the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens performing clearly superior to the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Lens and comparing remarkably well even against the excellent .

» Canon 16-35 f4 IS vs Canon 17-40 F4 PAGINA: TUTTE LE PAGINE | PAGINA SUCCESSIVA » Bob70 inviato il 06 Luglio 2014 ore 15:01 Cari amici credendo di fare una cosa utile per tutta la comunità del forum ho effettuato questo faccia a faccia tra il nuovo

The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Lens shares the 16-35’s small lens element extension feature, and the 17-40’s manual indicates that a filter completes the sealing. The 16-35 manual does not specify this. At 16mm, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM Lens

Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f4L IS USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to

31/7/2014 · More importantly though, the 17-40 is a great lens, but it’s not a razor sharp lens like the new 16-35mm f/4L IS, so it’s certainly going to be a compelling option. In this article I focused more on the 16-35mm f/2.8L II vs the new f/4 because that’s the audience that will have a harder time deciding if they give up f/2.8 for a sharper f/4 version with IS.

The 16-35mm f/4 L IS is Canon’s best ultrawide lens for nature, landscape, interior, real estate, general architecture and outdoor photography because there is no sharper Canon ultrawide, and it’s the only Canon ultrawide with Image Stabilization (IS) so you can leave your tripod at home. (IS) so you can leave your tripod at home.

Canon 16-35/4.0 L IS vs. 17-40/4.0 almost is a classical blog article und because of the Canon Cash-Back offer i couldn’t resist to buy one, and as long as the 17-40/4.0 is here to make a comparism. The Canon 17-40/4.0 L has a very fair price (arround 650,– €) and

27/10/2014 · For those of you who have used both the Canon 16-35 f4 and the Canon 17-40, do you think the 16-35 f4 is worth ~$400 more than the 17-40? I plan to use either of these lenses for landscapes, so I’d be shooting between f8 and f11 and on a tripod for most of the

Canon 16-35/4.0 L IS gegen 17-40/4.0 ist fast schon eine Art Klassiker und nachdem ich aufgrund der laufenden Cash-Back Aktion auch nicht widerstehen könnte, habe ich, solange das 17-40/4.0 noch hier ist, auch einen solchen Vergleich machen.

Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to

Comparison of Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM and the new Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM In der Ecke des 16-35 ist der Mast deutlich klarer und schärfer gezeichnet und es sind auch wesentlich mehr Details in den dahinterliegenden Bäumen zu erkennen

Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM重點規格 鏡頭結構:12群16枚 光圈葉片:9枚 最大光圈:F4 最小光圈:F22 鏡頭口徑:77mm 最近拍攝距離:0.28m 鏡頭尺寸:82.3×112.8mm 淨重:615g 建議售價:NT$ 34,900 對於傳統的135相機,50mm 焦段的鏡頭可以形成46

16/3/2015 · Canon 16-35 f4 IS vs 17-40 in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses MalVeauX wrote in post #17476180 Heya, If you want the best, the 16-35 is it. If you need IS, the 16-35 has it. It’s sharp corner to corner. Performs better than the 17-40 in every way.

20/1/2012 · If i were you i would keep the 24-105mm f4 l is usm and buy the 17-40mm f4 l usm to go with it. The 24-105mm f4 l is usm is my favourite lens for landscapes, portraits, and weddings and is sharp

23/2/2005 · Hi Al, I never used the 16-35 on my 10D but all the other lenses I used on the 10D were fine, I also used my 17-40 on a 1D mkII and it was great on that. I dont know why but It was just some

12/10/2014 · Click here to read the full review: Canon 16-35 F4 Review vs. 17-40 Shootout – | Graham Clark Photography (35.7GB of RAW/TIFF files) As a Nikon 14-24 and Canon 17-40 shooter I like that this lens has IS, but if there was a non-IS version I’d get that one. It has

17/10/2016 · Now I have another question. I love wide angle zooms for travelling. Better Canon 17-40 or Canon 16-35 f4 on the 7MKII? Talking about IQ and colors and overall quality. I can get the 17-40 used for about 500 euro more or less and 16-35 f4 used for 800 euros. Is it

Hi folks, I’ve had a 17-40 f4 for a few years now and get on relatively well Ian Gratton 51 months ago 8 replies Feed – Subscribe to the Canon EF 16-35 f/4L IS pool View as slideshow Grab the link Here’s a link to this group. Just copy and paste! show short

Reports of the 16-35 F4 IS performing critically sharp are true. However, based on the results I’m seeing, the reports of the Canon 16-35 F4 blowing the Canon 17-40mm F4 out of the water are false. When it comes to center sharpness the two are nearly identical

1/10/2014 · Canon 16-35 F4 Review vs. 17-40 Shootout in Canon EF and EF-S Lenses Depends on the lens used – and most of the time not after star trails. Canon lenses tend to show coma pretty much at any aperture, probably way more noticeable wide open.

5/10/2015 · I have the 17-40 but am thinking about selling it to help fund an FE 16-35. I want the Sony as a one lens hiking solution without adapters, and I like that it’s a little wider. The canon is pretty good stopped down. I haven’t used the canon 16-35 f/4, but I did compare

16/12/2009 · Canon 17-40 vs Canon 24-105 Discussion in ‘Canon EOS’ started by jake_hilleary, Dec 13, 2009. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > jake_hilleary The 17-40, your 50 and a 70-200 f4 would make a very nice kit. Watch the 70-200 f4 for focusing problems. Make sure your

Read our detailed comparison of the Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L II USM vs Canon EF 17-40mm f4.0L USM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to

31/12/2017 · p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Canon 24-70 ii or 16-35 f4 I am getting more into landscape and travel photography as well as taking photos of my son. I am shooting on a 6d my question is would I really miss the 8mm difference. I have an opportunity to pick up the 24-70

28/3/2010 · 最近想添購一隻超廣角鏡頭EF 16-35 F2.8 I、II 代 或 17-40 F4原則上比較屬意 F2.8聽說一代抗耀光性較差但二代價格已經被哄抬到五萬多在 digital picture的比較二代是有比一代好一點但差異看起來並不大想請問EF 16-35 F2.8 一二代除(Canon單眼相機 第1頁)

“ However, based on the results I’m seeing, the reports of the Canon 16-35 F4 blowing the Canon 17-40mm F4 out of the water are false. When it comes to center sharpness the two are nearly identical at every focal length and F-number. When it comes to corner

其實17-40的星芒遠觀還不錯,但是放大來看還是會有小分岔 如果要完美海膽形星芒,只能考慮f2.8系列了 (如17-35, 16-35, 16-35 II) 8. 這張也是很常見的canon發色 老實說玩相機還是用原廠好一些,無論在外觀硬體搭配或看不到的對焦能力、乃至於後製處理,支援